Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hpZ1S-0006BE-MB for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:10:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hpZ0T-0003sA-EG for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:09:37 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hpZ0T-0003s3-45 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:09:37 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hpZ0Q-0006h4-Lh for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:09:36 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x6ME9VrI023575; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:09:31 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Daniel Gustafsson , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Formatting of warning about using ident In-reply-to: <05d9e235-118f-2dbc-95c3-e1a51c19dad1@2ndquadrant.com> References: <05d9e235-118f-2dbc-95c3-e1a51c19dad1@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:23:12 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <23573.1563804571.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:09:31 -0400 Message-ID: <23574.1563804571@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > In general, I would argue in favor of fewer "note", "warning", etc. > Some documentation pages are now just a sequence of "note"s and little > proper text. If the normal text properly explains a topic and its pros > and cons, then we don't need all that extra decoration and it makes the > text easier to read. +1. With the way these things are rendered in the current HTML output, they are so visually distracting that they ought to be reserved for absolutely critical info. I almost feel that we should ban entirely, because the rendering is completely disproportional to the meaning. (Or, maybe, somebody could tinker with the stylesheets?) regards, tom lane