Received: from makus.postgresql.org (makus.postgresql.org [98.129.198.125]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F11062698B for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:01:12 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SJmUR-0005Zf-3c for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:01:11 +0000 Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q3GE0tSG023638; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:00:55 -0400 (EDT) To: Thom Brown cc: pgsql-docs Subject: Re: Invalid example paths In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Thom Brown message dated "Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:13:41 +0100" Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:00:55 -0400 Message-ID: <23637.1334584855@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Archive-Number: 201204/31 X-Sequence-Number: 7285 Thom Brown writes: > I've noticed that in the documentation there are path names that contain '...'. > Are these supposed to be ellipses? Yes. > It's not clear that they are, and > there's no mention of it on the conventions page. I wouldn't have thought it would be necessary to spell that out. The path is obviously not valid if taken literally. regards, tom lane