Received: from localhost (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB2847614E
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:16:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44FF476138
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9LFGBhR023666;
	Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Forwarded mail... 
In-reply-to: <200210172334.g9HNYml25239@candle.pha.pa.us> 
References: <200210172334.g9HNYml25239@candle.pha.pa.us>
Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
	message dated "Thu, 17 Oct 2002 19:34:48 -0400"
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:16:11 -0400
Message-ID: <23665.1035213371@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS new-20020517
X-Archive-Number: 200210/20
X-Sequence-Number: 1514

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Any ideas on this?  Are we missing images?

Perhaps he's unhappy about the incomplete transaction of arch-dev.sgml.
It looks to me like the figures in the LaTeX original never got merged
in, leading to stuff like this:

    throughout concurrent data access. Figure
    \ref{connection} illustrates the interaction of the master process 
    <literal>postmaster</literal> the server process
    <literal>postgres</literal> and a client application. 

Right offhand, I can't see where the images in doc/src/graphics/
are being used anymore, either.  They used to be used, no?

			regards, tom lane