Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C221337B66 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:46:56 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76286-06 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:46:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E0C1337B58 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:46:48 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8MDkkGW023849; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:46:46 -0400 (EDT) To: Magnus Hagander cc: Thom Brown , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: CVS in docs In-reply-to: References: <10904.1285108697@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:05:26 +0200" Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 09:46:46 -0400 Message-ID: <23848.1285163206@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/88 X-Sequence-Number: 6078 Magnus Hagander writes: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane wrote: >> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing >> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning >> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching. > Agreed. > What about the messages in configure? > "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL > from CVS nor" I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch. regards, tom lane