Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952156325FD for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:51:51 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61675-01 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:51:49 -0300 (ADT) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40F4632348 for ; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 19:51:49 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n37Mpldb024209; Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:51:47 -0400 (EDT) To: Bruce Momjian cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira , PostgreSQL-documentation Subject: Re: log_min_duration_statement units In-reply-to: <200904072247.n37Mlfh25381@momjian.us> References: <200904072247.n37Mlfh25381@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:47:41 -0400" Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:51:47 -0400 Message-ID: <24208.1239144707@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200904/25 X-Sequence-Number: 5113 Bruce Momjian writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> You know, it suddenly strikes me that this is going in largely the wrong >> direction. > Right, the problem particularly is with the -1/special values that don't > have a real unit. I don't object to what you did to postgresql.conf.sample, but I think you should revert the changes to the descriptions in guc.c. regards, tom lane