Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k34QS-00080I-IV for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 21:24:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k34QP-00030p-WC for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 21:24:46 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k34QP-00030h-Qd for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 21:24:45 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k34QJ-0001jX-0O for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 21:24:44 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 074LOXqB2462512; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 17:24:33 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Ganesh A Hegde cc: Magnus Hagander , Pg Docs Subject: Re: typo in sentence In-reply-to: References: <159557805290.620.5799935291704169810@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to Ganesh A Hegde message dated "Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:07:19 +0530" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2462510.1596576273.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 17:24:33 -0400 Message-ID: <2462511.1596576273@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Ganesh A Hegde writes: > There is only a single sentence starting with 'if' and not two. The phrase > 'it is therefore ..' is preceded by a comma and not a period. Hence, > there's a single sentence and not two as you are referring to. I concur with Magnus that the "therefore" refers to the sentences preceding this one. While we could just drop it as you suggest, maybe better is to rearrange: Therefore, if one PostgreSQL server instance is to house projects or users that should be separate and for the most part unaware of each other, it is recommended to put them into separate databases. regards, tom lane