Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDjQG-0002Zl-Uq for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:40:57 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDjQG-0005yN-AO for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:40:56 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDjQF-0005yH-Np for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:40:55 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WDjQD-0003Z5-MM for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 23:40:55 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1CNePou002470; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:40:25 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Vik Fearing , PG Docs Subject: Re: Links for upgraders In-reply-to: <1392173905.30895.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> References: <52DCC72E.5010009@dalibo.com> <23031.1390203350@sss.pgh.pa.us> <52DD4402.8070307@dalibo.com> <1392173905.30895.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:58:25 -0500" Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:40:25 -0500 Message-ID: <2469.1392248425@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Peter Eisentraut writes: > I think it would be even better to link directly to the migration notes, > not to the top-level section of the release notes. I suggest to add a > link target like > > Migration to Version 9.2.4 > and then link to that. I experimented with this and didn't really find that it improved the browsing experience any compared to what Vik did. It might be noticeably better if we had any significant amount of text above the "migration" section, but we never do. I'd prefer *not* to add yet another place where the version number has to be manually adjusted each time one makes a new release-notes section. (This is a task we've failed at a few times in the past ;-), so I'm not just hypothecating.) So I'm -1 for this unless there's really, really strong contrary opinion. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs