Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9NTW-0005jJ-9e for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:39:54 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9NTV-00069v-AZ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:39:53 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9NTU-00069o-IS for pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:39:52 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c9NTQ-00058D-Qy for pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:39:51 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uAN2dlKe024808; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:39:47 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: pgsql-docs@postgreSQL.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] switching documentation build to XSLT In-reply-to: <1aff5a5f-64aa-91c4-41c4-7952afe8a792@2ndquadrant.com> References: <2cdfe551-eb7b-b319-c96d-0d53cc0c2db8@2ndquadrant.com> <1aff5a5f-64aa-91c4-41c4-7952afe8a792@2ndquadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Wed, 16 Nov 2016 06:17:54 -0800" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24806.1479868787.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:39:47 -0500 Message-ID: <24807.1479868787@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Peter Eisentraut writes: > If you find any changes in the output that bother you, let pgsql-docs know. So, while I'm complaining, have a look at the Note near the bottom of https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/datatype-numeric.html and compare to its appearance in https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/datatype-numeric.html Now, to my taste, our past markup of note/tip/etc is already overemphasizing them. They're inset with narrower margins and put on a different-color background, which makes it hard to avoid the impression that they're the most important thing on the page and you should barely bother to read anything else. In almost no case is that actually warranted; certainly not for stuff with markup less than . (Personally I'd argue that means it's *less* important than the surrounding text, not more so.) But putting them in bold type with a separated heading is just over the top. What are we going to do for text that's actually critical ... make it bright red and blinking? Just to add confusion, the note on the previous page is set in normal type: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/datatype.html which I don't understand since the sgml source is about the same. But this one is still different from the way it was rendered by the old toolchain. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs