Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNkq5-0000MU-RY for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 22:12:29 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNkq3-0003xe-Uv for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 22:12:27 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNkq3-0003xQ-Os for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 22:12:27 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jNkq1-0006Eh-9J for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 22:12:26 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03CMCMQO024965; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:12:22 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Alexander Lakhin cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Getting our tables to render better in PDF output In-reply-to: References: <20200212221818.GA15503@alvherre.pgsql> <23574.1581555393@sss.pgh.pa.us> <10810.1581883655@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5d1f5b72-1b4a-6e15-6730-d94e2252a073@gmail.com> <525a6c9e-a4e2-cd8f-54b6-b69f40d70289@gmail.com> <701.1586638307@sss.pgh.pa.us> <9779.1586712791@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Alexander Lakhin message dated "Sun, 12 Apr 2020 22:33:33 +0300" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24963.1586729542.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:12:22 -0400 Message-ID: <24964.1586729542@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Alexander Lakhin writes: > 12.04.2020 20:33, Tom Lane wrote: >> I educated myself a teensy bit about XSL, and unless I'm missing >> something, this is really pretty darn trivial; the attached seems >> to do the trick. > I've come to almost the same solution simultaneously. I think this > should work for us. Thanks for looking at it! I did some more polishing on the first batch of tables and pushed it --- see what you think. regards, tom lane