Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gqmeQ-0005s9-Cs for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:23:38 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gqmeP-0008GZ-4w for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:23:37 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gqmeO-0008GO-V0 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:23:36 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gqmeM-00068a-Ui for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 22:23:36 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x14MNSm0025040; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 17:23:28 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: "Jonathan S. Katz" cc: Bruce Momjian , Magnus Hagander , Peter Eisentraut , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Release note trimming: another modest proposal In-reply-to: <856e0ec6-b42a-df70-56ca-f6c5ebf39903@postgresql.org> References: <19252.1533509841@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190125233111.GE13803@momjian.us> <16080.1548459680@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20190125234614.GH13803@momjian.us> <8fd2ae88-49de-26f3-def3-e4381cb7e774@postgresql.org> <21920.1548515166@sss.pgh.pa.us> <402d07a0-227b-71b7-0ecd-0b6c379e3cd0@postgresql.org> <18776.1549296730@sss.pgh.pa.us> <31322.1549315549@sss.pgh.pa.us> <856e0ec6-b42a-df70-56ca-f6c5ebf39903@postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to "Jonathan S. Katz" message dated "Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:13:21 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <25038.1549319008.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:23:28 -0500 Message-ID: <25039.1549319008@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk "Jonathan S. Katz" writes: > On 2/4/19 4:25 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> After a bit more thought, I'm inclined to propose that the policy be >> that we *don't* update the surviving back branches for branch retirement. > ...so I guess in turn, we would not update back branches with newer > releases as well, i.e. adding references about 12 to 10? That makes > sense, and eases some of the burden on releases. No, I definitely didn't have any intention of putting in forward references to later releases. That seems a bit weird. regards, tom lane