X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F82DD1B979
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 15:24:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
	by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 56368-05
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org>;
	Tue,  9 Mar 2004 11:24:39 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
	by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC368D1B906
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Tue,  9 Mar 2004 11:24:34 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i29FOYQN025308;
	Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:24:34 -0500 (EST)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml Makefile 
In-reply-to: <200403090910.53401.peter_e@gmx.net> 
References: <200403082235.i28MZXG19415@candle.pha.pa.us>
	<200403090832.19859.peter_e@gmx.net>
	<22080.1078818259@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200403090910.53401.peter_e@gmx.net>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
	message dated "Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:10:53 +0100"
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 10:24:33 -0500
Message-ID: <25307.1078845873@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
X-Archive-Number: 200403/16
X-Sequence-Number: 2306

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> CONTENT="Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.59"></HEAD

> This qualifies as ancient.  Newer versions are available from
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/projects/dsssl/index.html

Okay.  I see that both postgresql.org and Bruce are generating the docs
with
	Modular DocBook HTML Stylesheet Version 1.7
Shall we standardize on that and lynx 2.8.5 as the current "official"
versions to use for building the docs?

Also, I'm running openjade 1.3 on this machine, and as I recall it was
a serious pain in the arse to build.  Is it worth worrying about a newer
version of that?

			regards, tom lane