X-Original-To: pgsql-patches-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.2]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A53D1B44E for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:47:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (neptune.hub.org [200.46.204.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59410-08 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:47:08 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A76CD1B476 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 10:47:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i24EkmEw025496; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:46:48 -0500 (EST) To: Fabien COELHO Cc: Bruce Momjian , Jan Wieck , PostgreSQL Patches Subject: Re: "ALSO" keyword to "CREATE RULE" patch In-reply-to: References: <200403031903.i23J3Fx14760@candle.pha.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Fabien COELHO message dated "Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:40:04 +0100" Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 09:46:48 -0500 Message-ID: <25495.1078411608@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org X-Archive-Number: 200403/38 X-Sequence-Number: 9969 Fabien COELHO writes: > Most of the patch deals with the documentation, which is rather ugly > because it keeps telling about "INSTEAD" vs "non-INSTEAD" rules, as there > is no name for the default behavior. I think "ALSO" fixes this issue as it > clarifies the explanations. Hmm ... I find that argument much more convincing than any of the others ... Jan, what do you think? You invented this command's syntax IIRC. regards, tom lane