From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, hanefi.onaldi@microsoft.com,
        pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Broken link in pgcrypto documentation
In-reply-to: <9648F8FB-208E-4645-95D9-3E833C586512@yesql.se>
References: <170774255387.3279713.2822272755998870925@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <6366A797-44A1-4685-A6BF-B2E5293C4321@yesql.se>
 <CABUevEzOsYVQdqUPxwFhUZqkzTdn1dj1+mUF+cONKyETf+TcYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <2666720.1707853356@sss.pgh.pa.us>
 <9648F8FB-208E-4645-95D9-3E833C586512@yesql.se>
Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
	message dated "Tue, 13 Feb 2024 20:52:34 +0100"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <2669702.1707854904.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 15:08:24 -0500
Message-ID: <2669703.1707854904@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/2669703.1707854904%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
> On 13 Feb 2024, at 20:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm a little dubious about the "Technical References" list right below
>> it, too.  The RFC references are probably useful and stable, and maybe
>> the wikipedia ref is OK, but I have little faith in either the
>> stability or the long-term relevance of the other two links.

> Not even those are all that stable, while the RFCs' in question haven't =
been
> replaced they have all been updated with new RFC's which we don't link t=
o.  I
> think we are better off removing them as well and leaving reading up on
> security/crypto subject an exercise for the reader.

Good point.  Nuking both lists works for me.

			regards, tom lane