Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([2a02:16a8:dc51::56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fy3gG-0004in-Po for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:27:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fy3gE-0005df-0d for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:27:18 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fy3gD-0005dY-RL for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:27:17 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fy3g6-0000TZ-5f for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2018 23:27:17 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w86NR5tH026806; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 19:27:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: robjsargent@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: bad url in docs In-reply-to: References: <153627469242.23138.14343598812431598086@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Fri, 07 Sep 2018 01:17:24 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <26804.1536276425.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 19:27:05 -0400 Message-ID: <26805.1536276425@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Peter Eisentraut writes: > On 07/09/2018 00:58, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/libpq-ssl.html >> Version 10 >> The pointers off to hp.com seem to have gone away on or about 28Aug2018. > This has already been fixed in git and will be in the next minor > releases. Thanks. If you're thinking of 6f1591955, you don't seem to have back-patched that further than v11. regards, tom lane