Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBHMrU626623
	for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:53:30 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eBHMrbL26998;
	Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:53:37 -0500 (EST)
To: Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Who is a maintainer of GiST code ? 
In-reply-to: <Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001218000527.21815W-100000@ra> 
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.SK.1001218000527.21815W-100000@ra>
Comments: In-reply-to Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>
	message dated "Mon, 18 Dec 2000 00:08:10 +0300"
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 17:53:37 -0500
Message-ID: <26995.977093617@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200012/742
X-Sequence-Number: 2263

Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes:
> I checked 7.1 feature list and didn't find any mention about GiST
> but there are changes in GiST code. Who is a maintainer of GiST code ?

You are ;-).  If you expect to find someone who understands GiST better
than you, you're probably out of luck.

I recall having made a number of changes that applied to all of the
index access methods, including GiST --- but I was just changing
similar code in all the methods.  I don't claim to know anything
about GiST in particular.

			regards, tom lane