Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDAeS-0007WD-VJ for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:51:25 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDAeS-0007w0-DR for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:51:24 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eDAe4-0006Yn-2R for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:51:00 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eDAe0-0000Eh-MT for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:50:58 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id vAAEoqOX027004; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:50:52 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Magnus Hagander cc: Alvaro Herrera , Peter Eisentraut , =?UTF-8?B?xZ5haGFwIEHFn8OnxLE=?= , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: pg_replication_slots page links In-reply-to: References: <20171110115821.pqhccvfji673nhe3@alvherre.pgsql> <26573.1510324878@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:43:42 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <27002.1510325452.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:50:52 -0500 Message-ID: <27003.1510325452@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Magnus Hagander writes: > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think this can be blamed on a9ba6195f, which I only back-patched as >> far as 9.5 --- guess I didn't realize that the bogus section name >> existed further back. So I think the answer to your direct question >> is "a single page", but maybe we should instead proceed by bringing 9.4 >> into line with the later branches and then updating the docs? > Adding the mapping to the website was a single row in a db table, and is > already done, so it wasn't a lot of work. But there might be other reasons > to change it of course, for consistency. > Of course, actually *changing* it in 9.4 now will break any external links > pointing to it. Links within our own documentation will pick it up and > change accordingly, but anything that's linking from the outside will > generate 404s. The db table doesn't result in generating redirects then, I take it? Since you already have a fix, I suppose we should leave well enough alone. This isn't a big enough deal to expend a lot of sweat on. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs