Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqfU3-0002mM-LA for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:53:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqfU1-0000fL-EY for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:53:29 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqfU1-0000fE-8d for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:53:29 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kqfTu-0007ZT-Nd for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 16:53:28 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0BJGrKcQ271306; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:53:20 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: peihuachu1112@gmail.com cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Typo for cd commands In-reply-to: <160837647714.673.5195186835607800484@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <160837647714.673.5195186835607800484@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:14:37 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <271304.1608396800.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2020 11:53:20 -0500 Message-ID: <271305.1608396800@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > I believe that the following two commands in the page > "https://www.postgresql.org/docs/13/tutorial-sql-intro.html" should have a > slash in the middle of the four dots. > cd ..../src/tutorial > cd ..../tutorial Hmm. The first one is written that way to be vague about what the full path is. "cd ../../src/tutorial" would only be correct given very specific assumptions about what your prior working directory was. I'm not sure what the point of the second one is, but it seems like we should either remove it or make it look like the first one. regards, tom lane