public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: Roberto Mello <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2003 11:05:06 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> writes:
> It's not particularly fair, but we should discuss it. Either we
> consistently attribute every section or chapter, or we don't do it.
My inclination would be not to do it. There are very few sections
(if any at all) that are truly the work of just one person anymore,
even if the original text was all by one hand.
> Maybe it would be a good compromise to record significant
> documentation work in the release notes with the usual attribution?
Sure, the same way we credit significant code contributions.
regards, tom lane
view thread (16+ messages)
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Documentation in book length
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox