Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CA964FE0F
	for <pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:35:42 -0400 (AST)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 33327-04 for
	<pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@mail.postgresql.org>;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:35:40 -0400 (AST)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254EA64FD4B
	for <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:35:40 -0400 (AST)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id mAGGZbNB000275;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:35:38 -0500 (EST)
To: "=?KOI8-R?B?98nL1M/SIPfJ08zPws/Lz9c=?=" <corochoone@gmail.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-documentation <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Probably some fixes in syntax.sgml 
In-reply-to: <1f60b6160811160242i29a329a9x8f0332dd26496caf@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <1f60b6160811160242i29a329a9x8f0332dd26496caf@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to "=?KOI8-R?B?98nL1M/SIPfJ08zPws/Lz9c=?="
	<corochoone@gmail.com>
	message dated "Sun, 16 Nov 2008 13:42:26 +0300"
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 11:35:37 -0500
Message-ID: <274.1226853337@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=none
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 200811/10
X-Sequence-Number: 4995

"=?KOI8-R?B?98nL1M/SIPfJ08zPws/Lz9c=?=" <corochoone@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello, All.
> In syntax.sgml at line 131:

> ...
>    <para>
>     <indexterm><primary>identifier</primary><secondary>length</secondary></indexterm>
>     The system uses no more than <symbol>NAMEDATALEN</symbol>-1
>     bytes of an identifier; longer names can be written in
> ....

> probably must be:
> ...
> <indexterm>
>   <primary>identifier</primary>
>   <secondary>length</secondary>
> </indexterm>

>  <para>
>     The system uses no more than <symbol>NAMEDATALEN</symbol>-1
>     bytes of an identifier; longer names can be written in
> ...

> What you think?

AFAICS it's fine as-is.

			regards, tom lane