Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F98C632BCA for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:21:41 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65582-03 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:21:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1828632762 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:21:33 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o7TLLVMI028205; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:21:31 -0400 (EDT) To: Thom Brown cc: pgsql-docs Subject: Re: Doc fixes and improvements In-reply-to: References: <27296.1283113864@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Thom Brown message dated "Sun, 29 Aug 2010 21:42:31 +0100" Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 17:21:31 -0400 Message-ID: <28204.1283116891@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201008/142 X-Sequence-Number: 5966 Thom Brown writes: > On 29 August 2010 21:31, Tom Lane wrote: >> Ummm ... this seems to be almost entirely pointless whitespace changes. >> Sure you attached the right diff? > Yes, the whitespace changes you're seeing are because I closed the > tag early, then re-opened it again for the next paragraph, > which meant I reduced the indent for the content between them. The > paragraph is also closed again after, rather than containing > everything after it, so I removed the excess closing paragraph tag and > reduce the indentation of the affected sections. > This is because of what is rendered on: > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/functions-logical.html > The sentence "SQL uses a three-valued boolean..." isn't contained in a > paragraph at all and should be. Otherwise it's free text in a div. Uh ... it is too enclosed in a . What your changes seem to accomplish is to take the and constructs outside any , but what is the point of that? I don't see anything obviously wrong with the rendering on the page you cite. regards, tom lane