Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([192.204.191.242]) by postgresql.org (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAM4SLm84765 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:28:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id fAM4SOc28211; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:28:24 -0500 (EST) To: Brent Verner cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: sgml cleanup In-reply-to: <20011121232339.A28949@rcfile.org> References: <20011121224721.A28646@rcfile.org> <28119.1006402312@sss.pgh.pa.us> <20011121232339.A28949@rcfile.org> Comments: In-reply-to Brent Verner message dated "Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:23:39 -0500" Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 23:28:24 -0500 Message-ID: <28208.1006403304@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Archive-Number: 200111/66 X-Sequence-Number: 1139 Brent Verner writes: > On 21 Nov 2001 at 23:11 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: > | ?? I'm not seeing any of these problems. Are you using the recommended > | docs toolchain? > I have no clue about the recommended docs toolchain. I don't claim to be excessively clued either ... all I know is what I read in the PG docs: http://www.ca.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/7.1/postgres/doc-toolsets.html regards, tom lane