Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCn4q-0002B8-E8 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:22:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jCn4p-0007xM-4L for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:22:23 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jCn4o-0007u6-PK for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:22:22 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jCn4m-0002Py-8s for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:22:21 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 02DGMGdX028598; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:22:17 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Laurenz Albe cc: mrechte@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: 37.10.3 In-reply-to: <097245d95a9dc77a1f497f6d1c63b5fe1f77fad0.camel@cybertec.at> References: <158399487096.5708.10696365251766477013@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <097245d95a9dc77a1f497f6d1c63b5fe1f77fad0.camel@cybertec.at> Comments: In-reply-to Laurenz Albe message dated "Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:30:20 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28596.1584116536.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 12:22:16 -0400 Message-ID: <28597.1584116536@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Laurenz Albe writes: > On Thu, 2020-03-12 at 06:34 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> There is mention to macro PG_ARGNULL_xxx() which I cannot locate. Aren'= t you >> talking of PG_ARGISNULL(n) ? > Indeed. Indeed :-(. > Here is a patch for that. Not quite right, it's just PG_ARGISNULL without any type-specific decoration. Will push in a moment. regards, tom lane