Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [209.114.132.154])
	by mail.postgresql.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0S2Rlq14912
	for <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 21:27:47 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0S2Rf928822;
	Sat, 27 Jan 2001 21:27:42 -0500 (EST)
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: postgres limitation 
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101272201400.577-100000@thelab.hub.org> 
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101272201400.577-100000@thelab.hub.org>
Comments: In-reply-to The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
	message dated "Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:02:10 -0400"
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 21:27:41 -0500
Message-ID: <28819.980648861@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Archive-Number: 200101/185
X-Sequence-Number: 562

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> How about the full answer?  I think Tom did a fantastic job of writing up,
> be a shame to make it go to waste for brevity? :(

Perhaps someone would like to polish the answer into a section in the
Administrator's Guide?  Then the FAQ answer could stay as short as Bruce
likes, but point to the admin guide for more info ...

			regards, tom lane