public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
To: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 20:48:06 -0500
Message-ID: <[email protected]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+Tgmob0Jx_9v9KK95gojkjojeP2hTa38_P8JtOFXVDjjSkT=A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
<CA+Tgmob0Jx_9v9KK95gojkjojeP2hTa38_P8JtOFXVDjjSkT=A@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Robert Haas <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> guaibasaurus doesn't like this patch: you need to be more careful
>> about links, because the regression instructions are supposed to
>> compile as a standalone document.
> I wonder if these standalone things are really worthwhile. The whole
> point of this, ten years ago, was that people who were trying to get
> started with PostgreSQL might not have had neither the doc toolchain
> nor convenient Internet access available. Plain text documentation
> was essential for getting off the ground. This seems much less
> relevant today; is the annoyance of not being able to use links
> everywhere really buying us anything at this point?
That's a very fair question. It's a reasonable bet that pretty much
nobody actually looks at the text versions of either HISTORY or
regress_README anymore. It's conceivable that somebody somewhere makes
use of the text version of INSTALL when trying to get PG going on some
bare-bones platform ... but really, can't they look it up on the net?
How'd they get the PG sources they're installing, anyway?
I'm prepared to believe that these things are just dinosaurs now.
However, at least in the case of the release notes, we'd have to kill them
in all active branches not only HEAD, if we don't want surprises.
Comments?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (19+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox