Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56])
	by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-docs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1hqCdD-0004JT-C3
	for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:28:15 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org)
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <pgsql-docs-owner+archive@lists.postgresql.org>)
	id 1hqCdC-0005Sl-7a
	for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:28:14 +0000
Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29])
	by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <daniel@yesql.se>)
	id 1hqCdB-0005QZ-VZ
	for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:28:14 +0000
Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se ([194.9.95.112])
	by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <daniel@yesql.se>)
	id 1hqCd9-0007Qv-Tf
	for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 08:28:13 +0000
Received: from s554.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by s554.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20621F1401C
	for <pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:28:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from s500.loopia.se (unknown [172.21.200.36])
	by s554.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D390A795013;
	Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:28:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from s476.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6])
	by s500.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B6F1E14604;
	Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:28:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.2
	tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1] autolearn=disabled
Received: from s499.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6])
	by s476.loopia.se (s476.loopia.se [172.22.190.16]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with UTF8LMTP id nN8mT-0Uuc7m; Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:28:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Loopia-Auth: user
X-Loopia-User: daniel@yesql.se
X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 85.228.38.16
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (c-1026e455.027-294-73746f71.bbcust.telenor.se
 [85.228.38.16])
	(Authenticated sender: daniel@yesql.se)
	by s499.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 322791CDADD5;
	Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:28:09 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: Formatting of warning about using ident
From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
In-Reply-To: <05d9e235-118f-2dbc-95c3-e1a51c19dad1@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 10:28:07 +0200
Cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2895B548-0F29-4920-9ABA-701E09D07B47@yesql.se>
References: <B20006D2-AE84-40CE-97DE-A607A0027EE0@yesql.se>
 <bc0f78d9-c7e5-1804-9cc1-2fe30f16d2a2@2ndquadrant.com>
 <D7DCADB0-D7E7-4C1B-ACFD-7C1AD466EFE5@yesql.se>
 <05d9e235-118f-2dbc-95c3-e1a51c19dad1@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
List-Id: <pgsql-docs.lists.postgresql.org>
List-Help: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.postgresql.org/manage/>
List-Post: <mailto:pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Owner: <mailto:pgsql-docs-owner@lists.postgresql.org>
List-Archive: <https://www.postgresql.org/list/pgsql-docs>
Precedence: bulk

> On 22 Jul 2019, at 14:23, Peter Eisentraut =
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> Being a quote and being a warning are two orthogonal properties.  So =
in
> that sense, wrapping the quote in a warning element is more correct.
> But the problem is now that a warning box is meant to be formatted out
> of line, so writing something like
>=20
>    <para>This feature does this and that and the other, but
>     <warning>
>      You can really make a mess with this.
>     </warning>
>    </para>
>=20
> is not correct.  (I'm surprised the schema even allows this.)

According to the schema it=E2=80=99s legal, warning can be in a para and =
can itself
contain a para.

> I don't think that would be an improvement though.

I=E2=80=99m not a fan of the status quo, but I don=E2=80=99t feel it=E2=80=
=99s worth pursuing much
further so I=E2=80=99m withdrawing for now.  Thanks for reviewing!

cheers ./daniel=