Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYEIf-0006lL-GO for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYEIe-0001uK-Ek for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:08 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYEId-0001u0-PV for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:07 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bYEIa-00044I-VS for pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:06 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u7CFN3kX029053; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:23:03 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Simon Riggs cc: paddor@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Wording in TABLESAMPLE documentation In-reply-to: References: <20160811162148.26427.26037@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <26367.1471011853@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Simon Riggs message dated "Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:49:53 +0100" Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:23:03 -0400 Message-ID: <29052.1471015383@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Simon Riggs writes: > But now you mention it, I agree with you. Let's put it back to say > "sample" but also explain where that new sample comes from... my > attempt to explain this better is in square brackets > "If REPEATABLE is not given then a new random sample will be taken for > each query [based upon the global seed value for the current user.]" I think "global" might have implications we don't want. How about adding ", based on a system-generated seed"? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs