Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A741336971 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:37:20 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87480-07 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:37:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC9F1337B39 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 15:37:09 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8MIb7QY029255; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:37:07 -0400 (EDT) To: Magnus Hagander cc: Thom Brown , pgsql-docs Subject: Re: CVS in docs In-reply-to: References: <10904.1285108697@sss.pgh.pa.us> <26043.1285169700@sss.pgh.pa.us> <28722.1285178750@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29041.1285179952@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Magnus Hagander message dated "Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:28:09 +0200" Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:37:07 -0400 Message-ID: <29254.1285180627@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201009/102 X-Sequence-Number: 6092 Magnus Hagander writes: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 20:25, Tom Lane wrote: >> Uh, why only back to 8.2? > Based on the "the others are discontinued just over a month from now anyway"... Yeah, but they will each have a final release. Don't we want to have the updated info in the final releases? I don't care about the incidental CVS mentions, but replacing cvs.sgml with that new chapter seems worth the trouble. > BTW, there are a ton of conflicts backpatching each step. Welcome to the fun of back-patching. Did you get any leverage from cherry-picking, or did it seem to be just as stupid as plain "patch"? regards, tom lane