From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: demirgokhan@gmail.com
cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Correction
In-reply-to: <20171119193809.1464.50916@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <20171119193809.1464.50916@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Comments: In-reply-to demirgokhan@gmail.com
	message dated "Sun, 19 Nov 2017 19:38:09 +0000"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <29320.1511126279.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2017 16:17:59 -0500
Message-ID: <29321.1511126279@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org

demirgokhan@gmail.com writes:
> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-json.html
> Description:

> Shouldn&#39;t be below statement:=20

> &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries wi=
th the
> @&gt; operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default op=
erator
> class jsonb_ops.&quot;

> corrected to:

> &quot;Although the jsonb_path_ops operator class supports only queries wi=
th the ?
> operator, it has notable performance advantages over the default operator
> class jsonb_ops.&quot;

Uh, no, I don't think so:

regression=3D# select oid from pg_opfamily where opfname =3D 'jsonb_path_op=
s';
 oid=20=20
------
 4037
(1 row)

regression=3D# select amopopr::regoperator from pg_amop where amopfamily =
=3D 4037;
     amopopr=20=20=20=20=20
-----------------
 @>(jsonb,jsonb)
(1 row)

			regards, tom lane


--=20
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs