Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pL5DN-0007eo-2X for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:05 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pL5DL-0002yQ-Ln for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:03 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pL5DL-0002x6-Dp for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:03 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pL5DG-0003nL-PQ for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:02 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 30QGYtad2971767; Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:34:56 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Laurenz Albe cc: riivo.kolka@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Not an error but a difficult wording In-reply-to: References: <167463493588.2667301.13267758265445155872@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <2873117.1674697141@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Laurenz Albe message dated "Thu, 26 Jan 2023 05:49:47 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <2971765.1674750895.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 11:34:55 -0500 Message-ID: <2971766.1674750895@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Laurenz Albe writes: > On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 20:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'd modify one word in your version: >> >>   These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because >>   the files generated using these tools are included in the tarball. >> >> Or possibly "with" instead of "using"? > Both are better; I'd lean towards "with". Done that way then, thanks. regards, tom lane