X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC439DC982 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:46:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 41006-03-2 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:46:18 -0400 (AST) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey- Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B9A9DC9C8 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:46:10 -0400 (AST) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k04FkEEo002976; Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:46:15 -0500 (EST) To: Jaime Casanova cc: pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: mark wath catalogs are shared - was:(Re: [NOVICE] which database to login to to create global users?) In-reply-to: References: Comments: In-reply-to Jaime Casanova message dated "Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:45:10 -0500" Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 10:46:14 -0500 Message-ID: <2975.1136389574@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.065 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.065] X-Spam-Score: 0.065 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200601/12 X-Sequence-Number: 3402 Jaime Casanova writes: > On 1/3/06, pres wrote: >> i would find it helpful if Table 42-1 included a column that identified >> whehter each catalog is shared or not. convenient, but given that the >> documentation does contain it, not necessary. > is this acceptable or usefull? if so, i can do it after work... It seems like clutter to me. Whether a catalog is shared or not is not necessarily the first thing you want to know about it. regards, tom lane