Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqgTQ-0006sc-D8 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:20:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqgTP-0007h7-0o for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:20:07 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hqgTO-0007bB-Jy for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:20:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1hqgTL-0005PG-Cd for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:20:04 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x6PGK1gA029784; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:20:01 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: hzlopes@gmail.com cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Missing preposition 'of' In-reply-to: <156405745907.1201.8875523259267302920@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <156405745907.1201.8875523259267302920@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:24:19 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <29782.1564071601.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 12:20:01 -0400 Message-ID: <29783.1564071601@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > By the end of section 7.2.1.5, the preposition 'of' is missing: > "(...) we could find out which ones those are like this: (...)" > should read > "(...) we could find out which ones of those are like this: (...)" I dunno, the existing wording seems like perfectly good English to me, while your revision is at best awkward. regards, tom lane