Received: from eclipse.pacifier.com (eclipse.pacifier.com [199.2.117.78]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA05645 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 14:54:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dhogaza@pacifier.com) Received: from desktop (dhogaza.pacifier.net [216.65.147.68]) by eclipse.pacifier.com (8.9.3/8.9.3pop) with SMTP id LAA09541; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 11:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19990806115431.00e087c8@mail.pacifier.com> X-Sender: dhogaza@mail.pacifier.com X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Fri, 06 Aug 1999 11:54:31 -0700 To: Lamar Owen From: Don Baccus Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Cc: Postgres Hackers List In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19990806112347.00e0d9b4@mail.pacifier.com> References: <37AB25F0.CB67F617@wgcr.org> <37AAFF29.958CE9F2@alumni.caltech.edu> <3.0.1.32.19990806094228.00e0388c@mail.pacifier.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:23 AM 8/6/99 -0700, Don Baccus wrote: >Neither "pgdump_oid" or "foo" (my other example from my >follow-up message) appear to exist in pg_class or pg_tables. > >Thanks for the suggestion, though :( Things are getting more and more odd... I've done some more testing and things are now in a state where I can create a table, drop the table (and get the message "DROP" back), yet the relation still exists. In fact, I can do a "select count(*) from ..." on it and get zero rows back. Argh! Of course, now if I try to create a table with that name, I'm told the relation already exists. Different than the situation with pgdump_oid and foo, where I'm just told that the create failed. Obviously, some table contents somewhere must be messed up. Any ideas? - Don Baccus, Portland OR Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.