Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuRk-00015c-7j for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:15:52 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuRj-00074j-2z for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:15:51 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuRi-00074X-TH for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:15:50 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuRh-0002I3-GC for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:15:50 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03AEFkPa030627; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:15:46 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: alireza.darksun@gmail.com cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Difference options with the CREATE ROLE docs In-reply-to: <158647836143.655.9853963229391401576@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <158647836143.655.9853963229391401576@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Fri, 10 Apr 2020 00:26:01 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30625.1586528146.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:15:46 -0400 Message-ID: <30626.1586528146@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > This page says that "CREATE GROUP is now an alias for CREATE ROLE.", > But when u check the CREATE ROLE, u see they have different options, The implementations are the same, as you could easily find by experiment. Looks like people have been sloppy about updating the manual page for CREATE GROUP though :-(. Will fix, thanks for the report! regards, tom lane