Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-3.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 982A01337B47; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:42:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.243]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 38052-01-7; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 18:42:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23671337B43; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:42:13 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p34Ig7Rq003187; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:42:07 -0400 (EDT) To: Robert Haas cc: Susanne Ebrecht , Gabriele Bartolini , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, PostgreSQL-development Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations In-reply-to: References: <4D998B49.8050000@2ndQuadrant.it> <4D99F09D.3000606@2ndQuadrant.it> <1503.1301935044@sss.pgh.pa.us> <4D99FF55.9070301@2ndQuadrant.com> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas message dated "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:28:47 -0400" Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 14:42:07 -0400 Message-ID: <3186.1301942527@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201104/23 X-Sequence-Number: 6594 Robert Haas writes: > Even if that doesn't turn out to be the case, this is pretty harmless, > so maybe we should just apply it and move on. I have no great objection to the patch as such; just wondering what the roadmap is. regards, tom lane