Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqWXs-0001nL-5g for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 03:02:44 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with smtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqWXr-0001xD-Gf for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 03:02:43 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:1501:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqWXr-0001x1-3V; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 03:02:43 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cqWXo-0004yS-0X; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 03:02:41 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v2M32bkC032521; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:02:37 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Peter Eisentraut cc: Tatsuo Ishii , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Questionable tag usage In-reply-to: References: <20170105.092557.1822243556008160851.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp> <25963.1483591811@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut message dated "Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:50:42 -0400" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <32519.1490151757.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:02:37 -0400 Message-ID: <32520.1490151757@sss.pgh.pa.us> X-Pg-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-Archive: List-Help: List-ID: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Mailing-List: pgsql-docs Precedence: bulk Sender: pgsql-docs-owner@postgresql.org Peter Eisentraut writes: >> On 1/4/17 11:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> Anyway, bottom line is I'm not terribly excited about fixing just this >>> one place. I think we need to decide whether we like the new more-verbose >>> output for links. If we don't, we need to fix the markup rules to not do >>> that. If we do, there are a lot of places that need adjustment to be less >>> duplicative, and we should try to be somewhat systematic about fixing >>> them. > This question is still open. Do we want to keep the new linking style > Section 1.2.3, "Title", or revert back to the old style just Section > 1.2.3? It's a simple toggle setting. I'd vote for reverting for now. If someone wants to run through the docs and make considered decisions about where the more verbose style is a win and where it isn't, then we could make the style change. But that does not seem like a high-priority task --- and at the moment, what we've got is a huge pile of docs that were written with the less verbose style of markup in mind. So my bet is that there's a lot of places where more-verbose is not a win. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs