Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmgSh-0006Bw-Pm for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:07:39 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmgSd-00088k-TC for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:07:35 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmgSd-00088X-NL for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:07:35 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kmgSb-0002y5-Ni for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 17:07:35 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0B8H7P243256724; Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:07:27 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Laurenz Albe cc: bugs-postgresql@antipoul.fr, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Mention invalid null byte sequence In-reply-to: <48125106de1a275b1e0c2d46b7c0a56a2b0675cb.camel@cybertec.at> References: <160720552914.710.16625261471128631268@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <0f0470f6d8c543793d2b71913cb230daea1aef3a.camel@cybertec.at> <3153759.1607372842@sss.pgh.pa.us> <48125106de1a275b1e0c2d46b7c0a56a2b0675cb.camel@cybertec.at> Comments: In-reply-to Laurenz Albe message dated "Tue, 08 Dec 2020 11:34:15 +0100" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3256722.1607447245.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2020 12:07:25 -0500 Message-ID: <3256723.1607447245@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Laurenz Albe writes: > On Mon, 2020-12-07 at 15:27 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I agree with the submitter that the place one would expect to read about >> this is in datatype-character.html. So I'd propose the attached. >> Maybe there's reason to repeat the info in charset.sgml, but it seems >> like more of a datatype limitation than a character set issue. > +1 on your patch. Pushed, thanks for looking it over. regards, tom lane