Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sP2kq-002c3v-BI for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:22:48 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sP2ko-00Ac1q-A9 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:22:47 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sP2ko-00Ac1i-2Y for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:22:46 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sP2kn-000FM3-1N for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2024 16:22:46 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 463GMh4E3260795; Wed, 3 Jul 2024 12:22:43 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Gustafsson cc: pgsql-docs Subject: Re: Document when ssl_prefer_server_ciphers went in In-reply-to: <5D7E0F5E-E620-4D54-8788-66D421AC76F0@yesql.se> References: <5D7E0F5E-E620-4D54-8788-66D421AC76F0@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson message dated "Wed, 03 Jul 2024 11:23:25 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3260793.1720023763.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2024 12:22:43 -0400 Message-ID: <3260794.1720023763@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Daniel Gustafsson writes: > In the documentation for ssl_prefer_server_ciphers we only say it's not = in > "older version" but we omit to specify it further. Since it's a fairly > important setting for security I think it makes sense to add the version= to > help users, as in the small attached diff (which also adds proper markup= in the > paragraph while in there). This could be shortened perhaps: - Older PostgreSQL versions do not have this setting and always use= the + PostgreSQL versions before 9.4 do not = have this setting and always use the regards, tom lane