Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuvi-0001xe-4E for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:46:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuvg-0000tT-VT for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:46:48 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuvg-0000tM-Pe for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:46:48 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jMuve-00060a-Fl for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:46:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id 03AEkhcq032711; Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:46:43 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: tlamarre91@gmail.com cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: 11.7. Indexes on Expressions In-reply-to: <158648685043.655.3074746555320970574@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <158648685043.655.3074746555320970574@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Fri, 10 Apr 2020 02:47:30 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <32709.1586530003.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2020 10:46:43 -0400 Message-ID: <32710.1586530003@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/indexes-expressional.html > It appears as if the paragraph beginning: "If we were to declare this index > UNIQUE..." > actually belongs just before the paragraph beginning: "Expression indexes > also allow control over..." > as it appears to pertain to the previous example block. Yeah, I agree, somebody was sloppy about inserting a new paragraph. Will fix, thanks for the report! regards, tom lane