X-Original-To: pgsql-docs-postgresql.org@localhost.postgresql.org Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FA754B5C for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:40:40 -0300 (ADT) Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09340-06 for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:40:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6B654B4F for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:40:29 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4BDd8Tw003312; Wed, 11 May 2005 09:39:08 -0400 (EDT) To: Michael Glaesemann Cc: "Vladimir Chukharev" , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org Subject: Re: Two points about docs In-reply-to: <55f562ab2754e9d7a018a56e88c9bccf@myrealbox.com> References: <200505100150.j4A1oGa03929@candle.pha.pa.us> <55f562ab2754e9d7a018a56e88c9bccf@myrealbox.com> Comments: In-reply-to Michael Glaesemann message dated "Wed, 11 May 2005 16:00:02 +0900" Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:39:08 -0400 Message-ID: <3311.1115818748@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.007 tagged_above=0 required=5 tests=AWL X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 200505/21 X-Sequence-Number: 2986 Michael Glaesemann writes: > On May 11, 2005, at 15:50, Vladimir Chukharev wrote: >> And I still think that an additional Appendix with a list of all >> functions and referencies to their descriptions would be very usefull. >> Can you comment on that? > This has been brought up in the past. I don't think there's any reason > there can't be one. Want to make a function appendix? :) I think this is more conventionally called an index ;-) regards, tom lane