Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gpDxH-0000Nh-Vg for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:08:40 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gpDxG-00025y-4Y for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:08:38 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gpDxF-00025q-Ry for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:08:38 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gpDxD-0001K4-B5 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:08:36 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x0VF8SYv003380; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:08:28 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: Bruce Momjian cc: sivasubramanian.bagavathiappan@cognizant.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Release Notes for PostgreSQL v10.4 is same as release 9.6.9 In-reply-to: <20190131145245.GH22941@momjian.us> References: <154894366115.1297.3806978921074907055@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <20190131145245.GH22941@momjian.us> Comments: In-reply-to Bruce Momjian message dated "Thu, 31 Jan 2019 09:52:45 -0500" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3378.1548947308.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 10:08:28 -0500 Message-ID: <3379.1548947308@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Precedence: bulk Bruce Momjian writes: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 02:07:41PM +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote: >> I could see the features, release date are identical in version 10.4 and >> 9.6.9. Can you please check and this could help in choosing the right >> version for any upgrade plan? > I see different content at those two URLs. I don't understand your > question. I think the OP is confused by the fact that there's so much overlap between those sets of release notes. But that's to be expected from concurrent minor updates. When we back-patch a bug fix, it very often applies to several release branches; and when that happens we almost always use identical release-note entries for all the branches. Another possible source of confusion is the version number format change. 10.4 is a minor release in the v10 branch, not a major release such as 9.6 was. regards, tom lane