Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sPO80-004Kr2-S6 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 15:12:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sPO7x-000VIu-Pv for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 15:12:06 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sPO7x-000VIl-Ic for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 15:12:06 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sPO7v-000Nw6-G6 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2024 15:12:04 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 464FC2fO3405485; Thu, 4 Jul 2024 11:12:02 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Gustafsson cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Joe Hellerstein's "Looking Back at Postgres" paper In-reply-to: <29108CAC-2CFB-470D-A3DC-E666C12EF4E4@yesql.se> References: <3345678.1720071633@sss.pgh.pa.us> <29108CAC-2CFB-470D-A3DC-E666C12EF4E4@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson message dated "Thu, 04 Jul 2024 09:06:54 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3405483.1720105922.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 11:12:02 -0400 Message-ID: <3405484.1720105922@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Daniel Gustafsson writes: > Unrelated to that, but reading history.sgml I found this sentend at the = end of > the page to be sort of misleading: > "Details about what has happened in PostgreSQL since then can be found > in Appendix E." > While technically true, it seems a bit overpromising in a history sectio= n to > refer to the release notes which are written in a very different way fro= m the > prose here (and the release notes are not even in Appendix E anymore). Well, it made sense with our old practice of including all the notes back to 1996 in appendix E. But now, not so much. The simplest fix would be to change this text to point to https://www.postgresql.org/docs/release/ regards, tom lane