Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pEBpn-0001ei-Ae for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 16:14:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pEBpm-0006Sa-8H for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 16:14:14 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pEBpm-0006SR-0X for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 16:14:14 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pEBpj-0002QA-K0 for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 16:14:13 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 307GE9sD3452215; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 11:14:09 -0500 From: Tom Lane To: shtoorman.sam@gmail.com cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: 8.5.2 "integral" - "integer" In-reply-to: <167309066389.659.17813482601797183601@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <167309066389.659.17813482601797183601@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Sat, 07 Jan 2023 11:24:23 +0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3452213.1673108049.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 11:14:09 -0500 Message-ID: <3452214.1673108049@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > I think, the "integer" will be good choice instead "integral'": > 8.5.2 > ... > "The offset will be shown as hh (hours only) if it is an integral number of > hours, else as hh:mm if it is an integral number of minutes, else as > hh:mm:ss. (The third case is not possible with any modern" "Integral" seems like perfectly good English to me here. regards, tom lane