Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMcyI-0000SS-12 for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:40:50 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMcyG-00029v-PD for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:40:48 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMcyG-00029o-Jc for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:40:48 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([66.207.139.130]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lMcyE-000897-JH for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:40:47 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 12HKefpx3609549; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:40:41 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: max1@inbox.ru cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: Duplicate "SELECT current_user;" In-reply-to: <161591740692.24273.4202054598867879464@wrigleys.postgresql.org> References: <161591740692.24273.4202054598867879464@wrigleys.postgresql.org> Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form message dated "Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:56:46 -0000" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3609547.1616013641.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:40:41 -0400 Message-ID: <3609548.1616013641@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk PG Doc comments form writes: > One of executions of "SELECT current_user;" is redundant and can be removed. Yeah, I think you're right. Done in HEAD. regards, tom lane