Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B590BB5DBF0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:17:27 -0300 (ADT) Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86]) by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35040-09 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 20:17:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130]) by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FF7B5DBF3 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 17:17:21 -0300 (ADT) Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p7IKHIns003654; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:17:18 -0400 (EDT) To: Koichi Suzuki , pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut Subject: Re: Make man on CentOS 5.6 In-reply-to: <2705.1313695658@sss.pgh.pa.us> References: <2705.1313695658@sss.pgh.pa.us> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Lane message dated "Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:27:38 -0400" Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:17:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3653.1313698638@sss.pgh.pa.us> From: Tom Lane X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.037 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.137 X-Spam-Level: X-Archive-Number: 201108/16 X-Sequence-Number: 6906 I wrote: > As far as I can tell, there is no "bold" template in the 1.69.1 files, > though I do see it in the 1.76.1 files. So this looks to me like we > have a minimum version dependency for docbook-style-xsl, and a > relatively recent one at that (1.69 is six or so years old). Some digging in the docbook release notes suggests that this probably changed in 1.73.0, which was released in July 2007: * Michael(tm) Smith: synop.xsl; block.xsl; info.xsl; inline.xsl; lists.xsl; endnotes.xsl; Changed handling of bold and italic/underline output in manpages output. Should be transparent to users, but... This touches handling of all bold and italic/underline output. The exact change is that the mode="bold" and mode="italic" utility templates were changed to named templates. (I think maybe I've changed it back and forth from mode to named before, so this is maybe re-reverting it yet again). I haven't actually tested whether we can build against 1.73.0, but that seems like a good place to start. regards, tom lane