Received: from maia.hub.org (maia-5.hub.org [200.46.204.29])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36751337C5A;
	Mon,  4 Apr 2011 16:09:16 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.86])
	by maia.hub.org (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.29]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 93238-02-7; Mon,  4 Apr 2011 19:09:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (sss.pgh.pa.us [66.207.139.130])
	by mail.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9781337C4C;
	Mon,  4 Apr 2011 16:08:25 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p34J8KZh003693;
	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:08:20 -0400 (EDT)
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
cc: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com>,
	Susanne Ebrecht <susanne@2ndquadrant.com>,
	Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@2ndquadrant.it>,
	pgsql-docs@postgresql.org,
	PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations 
In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=Ux689MQP0UYLwP6b8fL3m1Do6LA@mail.gmail.com> 
References: <4D998B49.8050000@2ndQuadrant.it>
	<BANLkTikwxtb9MU-Bn7XqCJSCEdEuJPL+Lg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4D99F09D.3000606@2ndQuadrant.it> <1503.1301935044@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<4D99FF55.9070301@2ndQuadrant.com>
	<BANLkTinSEBwkFNb7+Ow6+PgR8pKPOj+WGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTi=Ux689MQP0UYLwP6b8fL3m1Do6LA@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
	message dated "Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:02:39 -0400"
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:08:20 -0400
Message-ID: <3692.1301944100@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.1
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.91 tagged_above=-5 required=5 tests=BAYES_00=-1.9,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Archive-Number: 201104/27
X-Sequence-Number: 6598

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There are arguments as to why to switch to version 5, which is,
>> indeed, XML-only.
>> http://www.docbook.org/tdg5/en/html/ch01.html#introduction-why-to-switch

> AFAICT, the biggest problem with our existing toolchain is that it's
> hard for some people to get it working.

Indeed.  One thing I'd like to know is whether docbook v5 is any more
portable/easier to install.

			regards, tom lane