From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: y.saburov@gmail.com
cc: pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Dependency Tracking
In-reply-to: <174487434720.676.2340734095223332692@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
References: <174487434720.676.2340734095223332692@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Comments: In-reply-to PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
	message dated "Thu, 17 Apr 2025 07:19:07 -0000"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <36995.1745090748.1@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2025 15:25:48 -0400
Message-ID: <36996.1745090748@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Archived-At: 
 <https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/36996.1745090748%40sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk

PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/ddl-depend.html
>> PostgreSQL will be aware that the get_color_note function depends on the
>> rainbow type: dropping the type would force dropping the function, because
>> its argument type would no longer be defined.

> Maybe you should add that not only the function will be deleted, but also
> the 'color' column of the 'my_colors' table?

This paragraph is concerned with the dependency behavior of functions,
so I think adding that comment would just be off-topic complexity.

			regards, tom lane