Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: I'm surprised to see the word master here
From: Renee <renee.phillips@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <0268aaf1-02e2-9d29-a751-ec42c21a889f@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 18:18:47 -0400
Cc: davecramer@gmail.com, pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <36E41634-B602-4D7C-8ACE-7EA03D2DF6E5@gmail.com>
References: <156935509221.1111.13488785881287521100@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
 <0268aaf1-02e2-9d29-a751-ec42c21a889f@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Precedence: bulk

I was under the impression that both terms were being deprecated. Is that on=
ly the case when they appear in tandem?=20

> On Sep 24, 2019, at 6:05 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadran=
t.com> wrote:
>=20
>> On 2019-09-24 21:58, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>>=20
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/logical-replication-publication.=
html
>> Description:
>>=20
>> I was under the impression we were removing the use of that word from our=

>> docs ?
>=20
> $ git grep -w master | wc -l
> 611
>=20
> You might be thinking of "slave".
>=20
> --=20
> Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
>=20
>=20