Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sURVQ-0034Ye-Kr for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:49:12 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sURVO-00Gdwo-LK for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:49:11 +0000 Received: from magus.postgresql.org ([2a02:c0:301:0:ffff::29]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sURVO-00Gdwa-Di for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:49:10 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by magus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1sURVM-000CuQ-Fj for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 13:49:10 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46IDn5lB3701767; Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:49:05 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Daniel Gustafsson cc: David Rowley , Muhammad Ikram , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: A minor bug in doc. Hovering over heading shows # besides it. In-reply-to: <5C909F36-9412-4CA0-BC86-43B4632CD17C@yesql.se> References: <3648828.1721279892@sss.pgh.pa.us> <5C909F36-9412-4CA0-BC86-43B4632CD17C@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Daniel Gustafsson message dated "Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:46:32 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-ID: <3701765.1721310544.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 09:49:05 -0400 Message-ID: <3701766.1721310545@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Daniel Gustafsson writes: > While not a standard the pilcrow [0] is, AFAICT from a bit of looking at= other > docs, commonly used for this. There is a lot of variability though so > whichever we choose it will be wrong one for someone. I like this suggestion better because that's U+00B6, ie part of LATIN-1, so it's *far* more likely to render correctly everywhere than U+01F517 is. We could also consider the section sign =C2=A7 (U+00A7). In any case, a tooltip would help reduce confusion. regards, tom lane