Received: from malur.postgresql.org ([217.196.149.56]) by arkaria.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruCQk-003OVO-Lq for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:26:35 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=malur.postgresql.org) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruCQj-005lCk-9t for pgsql-docs@arkaria.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:26:33 +0000 Received: from makus.postgresql.org ([2001:4800:3e1:1::229]) by malur.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruCQj-005lCc-2M for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:26:33 +0000 Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us ([68.162.161.243]) by makus.postgresql.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1ruCQg-0021PR-Rk for pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:26:31 +0000 Received: from sss1.sss.pgh.pa.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 439EQRdc3728114; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 10:26:27 -0400 From: Tom Lane To: Arne Sommerfelt cc: Daniel Gustafsson , Laurenz Albe , pgsql-docs@lists.postgresql.org Subject: Re: 8.14.5 jsonb subscripting In-reply-to: References: <171265510066.682.7886492568248508496@wrigleys.postgresql.org> <3724558.1712671234@sss.pgh.pa.us> <42EACFA6-A5B7-4286-B262-09E2CC315149@yesql.se> Comments: In-reply-to Arne Sommerfelt message dated "Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:09:44 +0200" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3728112.1712672787.1@sss.pgh.pa.us> Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 10:26:27 -0400 Message-ID: <3728113.1712672787@sss.pgh.pa.us> List-Id: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Post: List-Owner: List-Archive: Archived-At: Precedence: bulk Arne Sommerfelt writes: > Thank you! When googling it is easy to end up with latest docs, > unfortunately That's actually good news --- it used to be that Google would tend to steer people to very ancient versions of our docs. Sounds like the SEO work that we've done is paying off. However, if you're running a moderately old PG version, you need to make use of the links at the top of the page to go to the equivalent page in the older version's docs. regards, tom lane