Received: from www.wgcr.org (IDENT:root@www.wgcr.org [206.74.232.194]) by hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA52752 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 23:17:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lamar.owen@wgcr.org) From: lamar.owen@wgcr.org Received: from wgcr.org (lowen@dial-40.r8.ncbrvr.infoave.net [206.74.232.170]) by www.wgcr.org (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA06092; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 23:17:11 -0400 Sender: lowen@wgcr.org Message-ID: <37AF9A53.8CC2CE6E@wgcr.org> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 23:19:47 -0400 Organization: Little to None X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5-15 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Lockhart CC: Postgres Hackers List Subject: Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) References: <37AF8B62.58438CD7@alumni.caltech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > I'll bet that even the coiners of the term have some differences in > their pronunciation. For the record, I use "Postgres" usually, and > "Postgres-cue-ell" when forced... > Since we cap the "S", however you pronounce "SQL" should probably be > how you do the end of "PostgreSQL". Lamar, are you a "ess-quel" > person? That may be a regional dialect. Only in postgressive context (ouch...) I have been known to say 'squel' (as opposed to ess-quel....). If I could just inflect my Southern Drawl in text.... And I have said ess cue ell (not very often...)... Oh well. Minor points. I think it goes back to my Z80 days, where I'd pronounce the machine code -- it sounds real strange to say "sidbateotwo" to mean CD B8 02 (CALL x'02B8' in Z80 assembler), but I have actually done that. Just a little game that a friend and I would play. Incidentally, radically changing the subject, I have done some tests on the RPM-packaged perl client, with great success. I am also experimenting with my new (3lo) RPM's, which are the first try to package the regression tests. Now to see if they run ;-/ As soon as the RedHat 5.2 machine (a creaky 486-100 w/16MB) finishes a good build, I'll post. Although, I am hitting snags -- the regression tests have some strange requirements -- ie, the resulting regress.so in the package is built to require /usr/local/bin/perl, and /usr/local/bin/python..... Oh well; I'll slog through it. Now to learn enough python to be dangerous... Lamar